Tagung  |  04.11.2016 | 09:00  –  18:00

4th Crowdinvesting Symposium “Financial Decision Making and the Internet”

Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, München, Raum E10

Am Freitag, den 4. November 2016, findet am Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb das 4. Crowdinvesting Symposium statt.

2016 lautet der Schwerpunkt des Symposiums ”Financial Decision Making and the Internet“. Es werden folgende Forschungsfelder behandelt: Entrepreneurial Finance, Reward-Based and Equity Crowdfunding, Social Trading, Personal Financial Management, Robo Advice, Block Chain and Virtual Currencies.

Das Crowdinvesting Symposium bietet Akademikern und Praktikern eine Plattform, sich über die neuesten Entwicklungen im diesem Bereich auszutauschen sowie sich untereinander zu vernetzen. Darüber hinaus wurde ein Forum geschaffen, welches den europäischen sowie die nationalen Gesetzgeber bei zukünftigen Gesetzesvorhaben und Gesetzesreformvorhaben auf wissenschaftlicher Basis informiert.


Symposium-Agenda

  • 8:30 bis 16:00 Uhr – Wissenschaftlicher Workshop (auf Einladung)
  • 16 bis 16:30 Uhr – Ankunft und Registrierung
  • 16:30 bis 16:40 Uhr – Neueste Erkenntnisse der DFG-Gruppe Crowdinvesting – Lars Hornuf (Universität Trier und Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb)
  • 16:40 bis 17:15 Uhr – Keynote – Ethan Mollick (Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania)
  • 17:15 bis 19:00 Uhr – Podiumsdiskussion – u.a. mit Claas Ludwig (Federal Ministry of Finance), Ethan Mollick (Wharton School), Daniel Halmer (raisin), Erik Podzuweit (Scalable Capital), Andrea Rexer (Süddeutsche Zeitung)
  • 19:00 bis 19:30 Uhr – Get-Together

Das Symposium wird in englischer Sprache abgehalten.


Anmeldung
Anmeldung für den öffentlichen Teil des Symposiums ab 16 Uhr

Academic Workshop-Agenda
Zur Agenda
Zum Call for Papers


Rückfragen richten Sie bitte an Matthias Schmitt.

Seminar  |  25.10.2016 | 12:00  –  13:30

Brown Bag-Seminar: Taxing Royalty Payments

Steffen Juranek (Norwegian School of Economics)

Abstract:

The digital economy is characterized by the use of intellectual property such as software, patents and trademarks. The pricing of such intangibles is widely used to shift profits to low-tax countries. We analyze the role of a source tax on royalty payments for abusive transfer pricing, and optimal tax policy. First, we show that mispricing of royalty payments does not affect investment behavior by multinationals.


Second, it is in the vast majority of cases not optimal for a government to set the source tax equal to the corporate tax rate. The reason is that shutting down abusive transfer pricing activities needs to be traded off against mitigating the corporate tax distortion in capital investment. The latter can be achieved by some tax deductibility of royalty payments. If the true arm’s length transfer price equals zero or for special corporate tax systems that treat debt and equity alike (i.e., for ACE and CBIT), it will be optimal to equate both tax rates.

Paper can be accessed at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2839756

Tagung  |  21.10.2016, 09:00

Personal Data in Competition, Consumer Protection and IP Law: Towards a Holistic Approach?

9:00 Uhr, Post-Doc-Konferenz 2016, Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, München, Raum E10

The Max Planck Institute Post-Doc Conference 2016 seeks to advance the discussion on the challenges and future approaches of the law relating to personal data, in particular as regards competition law (including unfair competition law), consumer protection and general civil law as well as IP law. It provides young scholars (professors, assistant professors, lecturers and advanced PhD students) with an opportunity to present, discuss and publish their research.

Event Programme Post-Doc Conference 2016

Seminar  |  19.10.2016 | 12:00  –  13:30

Brown Bag-Seminar: Creativity Under Fire: The Effects of Competition on Creative Production

Daniel Gross (Harvard Business School)

Abstract:

Though fundamental to innovation and essential to many industries and occupations, the creative act has received limited attention as an economic behavior and has historically proven difficult to study. This paper studies the incentive effects of competition on individuals' creative production. Using a sample of commercial logo design competitions, and a novel, content-based measure of originality, I find that intensifying competition induces agents to explore novel, untested ideas over tweaking their earlier work, but heavy competition drives them to stop investing altogether. The results yield lessons for the management of creative workers and for the implementation of competitive procurement mechanisms for innovation.

Seminar  |  12.10.2016 | 12:00  –  13:30

Brown Bag-Seminar: Prepublication Information Sharing and Research Productivity: The Case of Academic Scientists

Marie Thursby (Georgia Institute of Technology/NBER)

Abstract:
We present preliminary results from a survey of 7,611 academic researchers across multiple fields in the US, Germany and Switzerland. The survey covers pre-publication sharing of research results, competition, norms of science, commercial orientation and size of research group. Results are presented across two related topics. Part I: We report the extent to which researchers report public (general) sharing of results prior to publication, and at what stage they share. Depending on their willingness to generally share and their propensity to withhold crucial parts respondents are divided into three types: sharers, ambivalent sharers and non-sharers. These are, respectively, 23.9%, 38.9%, and 37.2% of respondents. We estimate a probability model to examine the extent to which a belief that the norms of science hold in one’s area, competition and commercial orientation explain these field differences.

Part II: Recent research has considered the effect of team size on research productivity (citations, publications and patents). That work has typically focused on a single measure of team size (e.g., number of coauthors) and has failed to account for the endogeneity that exists between measures of research productivity and team size. We measure team size by number of coauthors, number in one’s research group, and number of groups worldwide in which there are collaborators. All three team size measures are found to be endogenous and instrumental variables estimation is used.

Seminar  |  11.10.2016, 18:00

Institutsseminar: Big Data and Profiling in the Digital Age: Is there a Need for Legislative Changes?

18:00 - 19:30 Uhr, Klaus Wiedemann, Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, München, Raum E10

Seminar  |  07.10.2016 | 14:00  –  15:30

Brown Bag-Seminar: Using Crowds to Crack Algorithmic Problems

Rinat Sergeev (Harvard University)

  • Introduction to Crowd Innovation Lab at Harvard, the Lab with a mission to study the contests, the crowds, and to use the crowds to crack challenges for NASA and Academia

  • The insights on crowdsourcing - advantages, trade-offs and niches

  • Algorithm and Data Science challenges as a sweet-spot of crowdsourcing - examples, results and stories

Dr. Rinat Sergeev is Senior Data Scientist & Chief Scientific Advisor at the Crowd Innovation Lab/NASA Tournament Lab at Harvard University. Rinat works as a head of data science team, and a lead science and technical expert on exploring and utilizing crowdsourcing approaches in application to the data science and algorithmic challenges, coming from NASA, Business, or Academia. Rinat received his PhD in Quantum Mechanics in Ioffe Institute, Saint Petersburg. His research interests include conceptual analysis, analytical approaches and models in multiple areas.

Seminar  |  06.10.2016 | 12:00  –  13:30

Brown Bag-Seminar: Fostering Public Good Contributions with Symbolic Awards: A Natural Field Experiment at Wikipedia

Jana Gallus (UCLA Anderson School of Management)

Abstract:
This natural field experiment tests the effects of purely symbolic awards on volunteer retention in a public goods context. The experiment is conducted at Wikipedia, which faces declining editor retention rates, particularly among newcomers. Randomization assures that award receipt is orthogonal to previous performance. The analysis reveals that awards have a sizeable effect on newcomer retention, which persists over the four quarters following the initial intervention. This is noteworthy for indicating that awards for volunteers can be effective even if they have no impact on the volunteers’ future career opportunities. The awards are purely symbolic, and the status increment they produce is limited to the recipients’ pseudonymous online identities in a community they have just recently joined. The results can be explained by enhanced self-identification with the community, but they are also in line with recent findings on the role of status and reputation, recognition, and evaluation potential in online communities.

Kartellrechtszyklus  |  20.09.2016, 19:00

Kartellrechtsvortrag: Sektoruntersuchung e-Commerce

19:00 - 21:00 Uhr, Thomas Kramler (Europäische Kommission), Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, München, Raum E10

Am Dienstag, 20. September 2016, 19:00 Uhr, wird in Saal E10 des Max-Planck-Instituts Thomas Kramler von der Europäischen Kommission, Leiter der Sektoruntersuchung e-commerce, zu den Zwischenergebnissen der Sektoruntersuchung vortragen.

Vorab wird in der Aktuellen Viertelstunde Dr. Ingo Brinker, LL.M. (Chicago) von Gleiss Lutz Rechtsanwälte über aktuelle fusionskontrollrechtliche Fragen (insbesondere Staatsunternehmen und Prioritätsprinzip) sprechen, die sich anlässlich der Neuordnung in der Saatgutbranche ergeben haben (ChemChina/Syngenta; Dow/Dupont; Bayer/Monsanto).

Wir bitten um Anmeldung bis zum 16. September 2016 bei delia.zirilli(at)ip.mpg.de.

Wir freuen uns auf interessante Diskussionen und Begegnungen.

Seminar  |  13.09.2016, 18:00

Institutsseminar: Gesetzliche Vergütungsansprüche in den Schranken des Urheberrechts (§§ 44a ff. UrhG) - vertragliche und außervertragliche Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten unter Berücksichtigung des höherrangigen Rechtsrahmens

18:00 - 19:30 Uhr, Claudius Pflüger, Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, München, Raum E10