Dr. Jurgita Randakeviciute

Books and Monographs

Teisės ir biomedicinos mokslų santykis Europos patentų konvencijos 53 (a) straipsnio kontekste (Socialiniai mokslai, teisė (01S)), Vilniaus universitetas, Vilnius 2018.

The role of standard-setting organizations with regard to balancing the rights between the owners and the users of standard-essential patents (MIPLC Studies, 27), 1. ed., Nomos, Baden-Baden 2015, 66 pp.

Contributions to Collected Editions, Commentaries, Handbooks and Encyclopaedias

Научный прогресс и право: quo vadis?, in: Проблемы гражданского права и процесса, ГрГУ им. Я. Купалы, Гродно 2016, 209 - 222 (together with Jevgenij Machovenko).

Europos Sąjungos taikomos ribojamosios priemonės ir teisė į teisingą teismą, in: Nepriklausomos Lietuvos teisė: liber amicorum profesoriui Jonui Prapiesčiui, Vilniaus universitetas Teisės fakultetas, Vilnius 2012 (together with Elze Matulionyte).

Journal Articles

Vakarų teisės tradicijos ir biomedicinos mokslų santykis Europos patentų konvencijos 53 (a) str. kontekste, VU mokslo darbai, Teisė 98 (2016), 135 - 152.

Moralės vaidmuo teisinėje sistemoje Vakarų teisės tradicijos kontekste, VU mokslo darbai, Teisė 101 (2016), 145 - 165.

Lithuanian reforms put onus on trade mark owners, Managing IP 2013 (together with Ruta Pumputiene).

Research Papers

Patent ambush: the commitment decision of the European Commission in the Rambus case, 4iP Council's research, 2017, 24 pp.

• Standard-setting is an essential tool for promoting technological development, innovation and competition, resulting in significant benefits to economic systems. Therefore, this procedure requires special attention and every attempt to impair standardization should be addressed immediately. Patent ambush, which is illustrated by the Rambus case, is one of the actions that could negatively affect this procedure and lead to serious distortion of competition. Despite the afore-specified adverse effects, as it is demonstrated by the European Commission’s decision as of 9 December 2009 in the afore-mentioned Rambus case, the application of the provisions of the current EU competition law is quite problematic and unclear. Taking into consideration the afore-specified difficulties, this work aims at analysing the issues that have risen while assessing patent ambush as an abuse of a dominant position under the Art. 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to evaluate the arguments of the European Commission regarding the application of the latter provision.
• https://www.4ipcouncil.com/application/files/8715/1638/1033/Patent_Ambush_the_Commitment_Decision_of_the_EC_in_the_Rambus_Case_.pdf