Dr. Matthias Schmitt

Former Research Fellow

Innovation and Entrepreneurship Research



Areas of Interest:

FinTech, Crowdfunding, Crowdinvesting, Entrepreneurial Finance, Behavioral Finance, Empirical Methods

Academic Résumé

May - June 2017
Visiting Researcher Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, with Ajay Agrawal (Peter Munk Professor of Entrepreneurship, Professor of Strategic Management, Academic Director Creative Destruction Lab)

February - April 2017
Visiting Researcher Schulich School of Business, York University, with Douglas Cumming (Professor of Finance and Entrepreneurship; Ontario Research Chair in Economics and Public Policy)

2016 - 2018
Junior Research Fellow at Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition (Innovation and Entrepreneurship Research), Part of the DFG-Research Project “Crowdinvesting in Germany, England and the USA: Regulatory Perspectives and Welfare Implications of a New Financing Scheme”. Doctoral Thesis: Equity Crowdfunding: Local Bias, Capital Structure, and Venture Performance.

2014 - 2016
Research Associate at the Chair of Civil Law and Corporate Law, Prof. Dr. jur. Lars Klöhn, LL.M. (Harvard), LMU Munich, Part of the DFG-Research Project “Crowdinvesting in Germany, England and the USA: Regulatory Perspectives and Welfare Implications of a New Financing Scheme”

2012 - 2014
Studies in Business Administration (M.Sc.), LMU Munich

2009 - 2014
Professional Experience, Among Others at Siemens Corporate Strategies, Aschenbach Corporate Finance, EagleBurgmann USA

2011 - 2012
Academic Experience, Among Others as Teaching Fellow at the Seminar for Accounting and Auditing , Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Ballwieser, LMU Munich

2009 - 2012
Studies in Business Administration (B.Sc.), LMU Munich

Publications

Articles in Refereed Journals

Hornuf, Lars; Schmitt, Matthias; Stenzhorn, Eliza (2018). Equity Crowdfunding in Germany and the UK: Follow-up Funding and Firm Failure, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26 (5), 331-354. DOI

  • Today, startups often obtain financing via the Internet through many small contributions of non-sophisticated investors. Yet little is known about whether these startups can ultimately
    build enduring businesses. In this article, we hand-collected data from 14 different equity
    crowdfunding (ECF) portals and 426 firms that ran at least one successful ECF campaign in
    Germany or the United Kingdom. We empirically analyze different factors affecting
    follow-up funding and firm failure. The findings show that German firms that received ECF
    stood a higher chance of obtaining follow-up funding through business angels or venture
    capitalists, but also had a higher likelihood of failure. The number of senior managers,
    subsequent successful ECF campaigns, and the number of venture capital investors all had
    a positive impact on obtaining post-campaign financing, while firm age had a negative
    impact. Subsequent successful ECF campaigns were significant predictors decreasing firm
    failure.
  • Also published as: Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 17-09

Contributions to Collected Editions

Dorfleitner, Gregor; Hornuf, Lars; Schmitt, Matthias; Weber, Martina (2019). Allgemeiner Marktüberblick, in: Florian Möslein, Sebastian Omlor (eds.), FinTech Handbuch: Digitalisierung, Recht, Finanzen, 21-39. München: C.H. Beck.

Further Publications, Press Articles, Interviews

Dorfleitner, Gregor; Hornuf, Lars; Schmitt, Matthias; Weber, Martina (2016). FinTech-Markt in Deutschland - Abschlussbericht 17. Oktober 2016, 2016.

Hornuf, Lars; Schmitt, Matthias (2016). Success and Failure in Equity Crowdfunding, CESifo DICE Report, 14 (2), 16-22.

Monographies

Dorfleitner, Gregor; Hornuf, Lars; Schmitt, Matthias; Weber, Martina (2017). FinTech in Germany. Cham: Springer. DOI

  • In this study, conducted on behalf of the Federal Ministry of Finance, we provide the first comprehensive analysis of the German FinTech industry. We quantify the market volume of the industry between 2007 and 2015. On the basis of this data, we also predict the future development of eight segments of the FinTech market, offering detailed forecasts for the years 2020, 2025, and 2035. Moreover, we provide a comprehensive overview of current trends and the drivers of growth that have affected the FinTech industry in the past, as well as the factors that could spur and hinder growth within it in the future.

Discussion Papers

Hornuf, Lars; Schmitt, Matthias; Stenzhorn, Eliza (2018). Equity Crowdfunding in Germany and the UK: Follow-up Funding and Firm Failure, Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, No. 17-09.

  • Today, startups often obtain financing via the Internet through many small contributions of non-sophisticated investors. Yet little is known about whether these startups can ultimately
    build enduring businesses. In this article, we hand-collected data from 14 different equity
    crowdfunding (ECF) portals and 426 firms that ran at least one successful ECF campaign in
    Germany or the United Kingdom. We empirically analyze different factors affecting
    follow-up funding and firm failure. The findings show that German firms that received ECF
    stood a higher chance of obtaining follow-up funding through business angels or venture
    capitalists, but also had a higher likelihood of failure. The number of senior managers,
    subsequent successful ECF campaigns, and the number of venture capital investors all had
    a positive impact on obtaining post-campaign financing, while firm age had a negative
    impact. Subsequent successful ECF campaigns were significant predictors decreasing firm
    failure.
  • Available at SSRN
  • Also published in: Corporate Finance: An international Review, Special Issue: New Methods of Entrepreneurial Firm Financing: Fintech, Crowdfunding and Corporate Governance Implications, September 2018, Pages 331-354

Hornuf, Lars; Schmitt, Matthias (2016). Does a Local Bias Exist in Equity Crowdfunding? The Impact of Investor Types and Portal Design, Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, No. 16-07.

  • We use hand-collected data of 20,460 investment decisions and two distinct portals to analyze whether investors in equity crowdfunding direct their investments and portfolios to local firms. The results suggest that investors exhibit a local bias, even when controlling for family and friends. In addition to the regular crowd, our sample includes angel investors who invest considerable amounts and exhibit a larger local bias. By contrast, well-diversified investors are less likely to suffer from this behavioral anomaly. The data further show that portal design is important for attracting investors more prone to having a local bias. Finally, firms engaging in equity crowdfunding overcome funding barriers by attracting investors at all distances. These findings corroborate regulation targeted to specific investor groups, advise managers of equity crowdfunding portals about their business model, and inform individual investors of their biases.
  • SSRN

Presentations

19. - 20.06.2017

Does a Local Bias exist in Equity Crowdfunding?

Darden & Cambridge Judge Entrepreneurship and Innovation Research Conference

Location: University of Cambridge


12. - 14.06.2017

Does a Local Bias exist in Equity Crowdfunding?

DRUID Conference

Location: NYU Stern School of Business, New York


12. - 13.05.2017

Does a Local Bias exist in Equity Crowdfunding?

American Law and Economics Association - Annual Meeting

Location: Yale University


10. - 12.04.2017

Does a Local Bias exist in Equity Crowdfunding?

Royal Economic Society - Annual Conference

Location: University of Bristol


17.03.2017

Does a Local Bias exist in Equity Crowdfunding?

Finance Seminar

Location: Schulich School of Business, York University


18.01.2017

Does a Local Bias exist in Equity Crowdfunding?

TIME Colloquium

Location: Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich


13. - 15.09.2016

Equity Crowdfunding in Germany and the UK

Research Seminar

Location: Chiemsee


4.11.2016

Equity Crowdfunding in Germany and the UK

4. Crowdinvesting Symposium

Location: Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich


06. - 07.06.2016

Is There a Local Bias in Crowdinvesting? The Impact of Investor Types and Portal Design

3. ZEW Conference on the Dynamics of Entrepreneurship

Location: ZEW Mannheim


23.10.2015

Is There a Local Bias in Crowdinvesting?

3. Crowdinvesting Symposium

Location: LMU Munich


08. - 09.10.2015

Is There a Local Bias in Crowdinvesting?

19th G-Forum – Interdisciplinary Conference on Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Location: University of Kassel


02. - 03.06.2015

Does Geographic Proximity Matter in Crowdinvesting?

Workshop on the Economics of Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Location: University of Trier


15.04.2015

Does Geographic Proximity Matter in Crowdinvesting?

Crowdfunding Konferenz

Location: Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM), Bonn


20. - 21.02.2015

Does Geographic Proximity Matter in Crowdinvesting?

Economic Workshop

Location: University of Trier

Memberships

American Law and Economics Association

Royal Economic Society

Verein für Socialpolitik (German Economic Association)