Events

More information will follow soon.

Contact person: Elisabeth Hofmeister

Open source is key to innovation yet is assumed to be done largely through intrinsic motivation. How can we incentivize it? In this paper, we examine the impact of a program providing monetary incentives to motivate innovators to contribute to open source. The Sponsors program was introduced by GitHub in May 2019 and enabled organizations and individuals alike to pay developers for their open source work. We study this program by collecting fine-grained data on nearly 100,000 GitHub users, their activities, and sponsorship events. We first, using a difference-in-differences approach, document two main effects. One, developers who opted into the program, an action that does not itself entail a financial reward, increased their output after the program’s launch. Two, the actual receipt of a financial sponsorship has a long-lasting negative effect on two measures of innovation –repository creation and community-oriented tasks– but not in coding effort. Despite a net positive effect on innovation, sponsorship appears to crowd out intrinsic motivation, shifting effort toward self-promoting activities. Results from a pre-registered survey and experiment reinforce these findings, showing that modest sponsorship (USD 20) deters collaborative contributions compared to no compensation, larger rewards (USD 1000), or company sponsorships.

Contact person: Daehyun Kim

Subscription to the invitation mailing list and more information on the seminar page.

In China, most legal disputes concerning unauthorized data scraping from online platforms are adjudicated under the framework of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, particularly through the application of its general clause. In earlier judicial practice, courts interpreted this general clause in a manner that effectively granted platform data a level of protection akin to property rights. However, recent developments indicate a shift: fostering innovation has emerged as a key consideration in determining whether unauthorized data scraping constitutes unfair competition. This suggests that courts are beginning to balance platform data protection against the imperative of encouraging innovation. This study examines recent judicial practices in China concerning data scraping from online platforms, explicates the courts’ reasoning, and argues that although the incorporation of innovation into the legal balancing framework is a promising step, a narrowly construed understanding of innovation undermines the ability to genuinely achieve that goal.

Ziwei Cheng is an Associate Professor at the Law School, Shenzhen University. Her research focuses on anti-unfair competition law, with particular emphasis on data related issues and digital market regulation.

Moderation: Dr. Klaus Wiedemann

Title and abstract will follow soon.

Contact person: Malte Toetzke

Subscription to the invitation mailing list and more information on the seminar page.

Title and abstract will follow.

Contact person: Elisabeth Hofmeister

Subscription to the invitation mailing list and more information on the seminar page.

On 15/16 December 2025, the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition will host the 8^th Research on Innovation, Science and Entrepreneurship Workshop (RISE8), an annual workshop for Ph.D. students and Junior Postdocs in Economics and Management. 

The goal of the RISE8 Workshop is to stimulate an in-depth discussion of a select number of empirical research papers. It offers Ph.D. students and Junior Postdocs an opportunity to present their work and to receive feedback.

Keynote speaker of the RISE8 Workshop is Matt Marx (Cornell University)

Get the Call for Papers RISE8.

For more information see RISE Workshop.