Vortrag  |  05.03.2015, 07:30

Patent Collateral, Investor Commitment, and the Market for Venture Lending

19:30 - 21:00 Uhr, Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, München

Seminar  |  04.03.2015 | 12:00  –  13:30

Brown Bag-Seminar: Patent Collateral, Investor Commitment, and the Market for Venture Lending

Carlos Serrano (Universität Pompeu Fabra, Department of Economics and Business Economics)

The use of debt to finance risky entrepreneurial-firm projects is rife with informational and contracting problems. Nonetheless, we document widespread lending to startups in three innovation-intensive sectors and in early stages of development. At odds with claims that the secondary patent market is too illiquid to shape debt financing, we find that intensified patent trading increases the annual rate of startup lending, particularly for startups with more redeployable (less firm-specific) patent assets. Exploiting differences in venture capital (VC) fundraising cycles and a negative capital-supply shock in early 2000, we also find that the credibility of VC commitments to refinance and grow fledgling companies is vital for such lending. Our study illuminates friction-reducing mechanisms in the market for venture lending, a surprisingly active but opaque arena for innovation financing, and tests central tenets of contract theory.

Kartellrechtszyklus  |  18.02.2015, 18:00

Effective Tools, Convergent Views, Consistent Outcomes: Hopes for the Next Decade of Competition Policy

18:00 Uhr, Bruno Lasserre, Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, München, Raum E10

Bruno Lasserre is a member of the Conseil d’État, the French supreme administrative court, which he joined in 1978 after graduating from École Nationale d’Administration (ENA), the French national school for civil service.

Between 1989 and 1997, he served as Director for Regulatory Affairs, and then Director General for Posts and Telecommunications at the French Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications. In this position, he developed and implemented a comprehensive overhaul of the telecommunications sector, culminating in its full opening to competition as well as in the creation of an independent regulator.

He returned to the Conseil d’État in 1998, where he chaired the 1st Chamber for three years, before becoming Deputy Chairman for all litigation activities, between 2002 and 2004.

After serving as Member of the board of the Conseil de la concurrence (1998-2004), he was appointed President in July 2004, and in this capacity pushed through a major reform that transformed it into the Autorité de la concurrence, responsible for merger review and competition advocacy in addition to antitrust enforcement. He has chaired the Autorité since then.

He is also an Officer of the French Légion d’honneur and a Commander of the French Ordre national du Mérite.

Die Einladung zum Vortrag finden Sie hier.

Kartellrechtszyklus  |  18.02.2015, 14:00

Kartellrechtszyklus 2015

14:00 Uhr, Bruno Lasserre, Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, München

Bruno Lassère, Präsident des französischen Kartellamtes

Seminar  |  10.02.2015, 13:30

Institutsseminar

13:30 Uhr, Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, München, Raum E10

Das nächste Institutsseminar findet am Dienstag, 10. Februar 2015 um 18.00 Uhr s.t. im Raum E 10, Hauptgebäude, statt.

Sunimal Mendis wird sprechen über "Copyright, Digitization and the Public Domain: Is there a need for exclusive rights over digitized versions of rare public domain material in Europe?". Alina Wernick wird moderieren.

Seminar  |  04.02.2015, 12:30

Institutsseminar

12:30 Uhr, Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, München, Raum E10

Das nächste Institutsseminar findet am Dienstag, 11. November 2014 um 18.00 Uhr s.t. im Raum E 10, Hauptgebäude, statt.

Natalia Lukaszewicz wird sprechen über "A study on patent use exception for user-generated inventions. The Maker movement meets patent law".Franciska Schönherr wird moderieren.

Vortrag  |  22.01.2015, 08:30

Mythbusting Empirical Research

8:30 Uhr, Prof. Karin Hoisl, Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, München, Raum 225

Prof. Karin Hoisl is an Assistant Professor of "Invention Processes and Intellectual Property" at MPI and LMU, with vast experience in empirical research on patents and innovation. At our next Metacademic Lunch she will discuss how to conduct empirical research on intellectual property and address common questions on the topic such as:

- How can empirical research advance research on intellectual property law?- What kind of research questions can empirical methods answer to?- How can a lawyer conduct an empirical study?

Participants are also welcomed to ask about own empirical research ideas and projects.

To secure a seat, REGISTER yourself below AND* pay the lunch fee of 7,5 euros to the reception in the MPI main building (use keyword "Brown Bag" or "Lunch Seminar"). Be quick, the available 12 seats get filled on first come, first served basis!

*Please note that only the actual payment secures you the seat (registration is not sufficient to sign-up, but necessary to make the food choice);

For registration & more information about the topic and speaker visit:http://goo.gl/forms/ur1rExFrXO

Seminar  |  14.01.2015 | 12:00  –  13:30

Brown Bag-Seminar: Competition, Patents and Innovation

Susanne Prantl (Universität zu Koln, Department of Economics)

Seminar  |  13.01.2015, 13:30

Institutsseminar

13:30 Uhr, Dr. Jesus Ivan Mora Gonzalez, Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, München, Raum E10

Dr. Jesus Ivan Mora Gonzales wird sprechen über "Parasitism on Trademark Reputation: the Genuine Fake Markets".

Seminar  |  17.12.2014 | 12:00  –  13:30

Brown Bag-Seminar: The Co-Alignment of Open Innovation With Environmental Contingencies and Its Effect on Innovation Performance

John Hagedoorn (Maastricht University)

By linking an open innovation perspective and a contingency view, this paper contributes to the open innovation literature in two ways. First, answering the recent call of scholars, we bring environmental context into open innovation research. In line with a ‘fit as moderation’ perspective we claim that some environmental contingencies might be favorable for searching broadly, but less favorable for searching deeply. To the best of our knowledge this is the first empirical study that explicitly focuses on specific contingencies in the external environment that shape firms’ ability to benefit from open innovation. Second, rather than treating search openness as a homogeneous construct, we explicitly focus on the differential effects of breadth and depth on firms’ innovation performance. As we will show, this approach delivers a more fine-grained understanding of how contingencies affect the value of external search breadth and depth and their differential impact on innovation performance.