RISE Workshop Logo
Workshop  |  14.12.2026, 11:30  –  15.12.2026, 16:30

RISE – 9th Research on Innovation, Science and Entrepreneurship Workshop

Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb

Keynote: tba

On 14/15 December 2026, the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition will host the 9th Research on Innovation, Science and Entrepreneurship Workshop (RISE9), an annual workshop for Ph.D. students and Junior Postdocs in Economics and Management. 


The goal of the RISE9 Workshop is to stimulate an in-depth discussion of a select number of empirical research papers. It offers Ph.D. students and Junior Postdocs an opportunity to present their work and to receive feedback.
 

For more information see RISE Workshop.

Workshop  |  05.11.2026, 09:00  –  06.11.2026, 15:00

Editable World: Law, Policy, and Governance in ‘Phygital Realities’

Max Planck Law Workshop
Anmeldung erforderlich


Auditorium

Registration
 

Call for Participation

This expert workshop invites scholars and practitioners to explore the legal, regulatory, and policy implications of what we term the editable world, a socio-technical condition in which the physical environment becomes subject to real-time computational rendering.

Digital infrastructures are no longer confined to screens, platforms, or online spaces. With the rapid development of spatial computing, extended reality (XR), and AI-enabled wearable devices, digital systems are becoming embedded directly into perception, mobility, and everyday encounters. Streets, classrooms, workplaces, public institutions, and civic spaces are turning phygital: hybrid environments in which physical reality is continuously annotated, filtered, augmented, and personalized through computational layers.

While existing research and regulation have focused extensively on digital platforms, online discourse, and data governance, far less attention has been paid to environments where digital systems no longer merely mediate communication, but actively interfere with seeing, sensing, and inhabiting the world. In such contexts, perception itself becomes a site of intervention; public space becomes physically shared but also digitally customized; and longstanding conceptual distinctions between online and offline, public and private, infrastructure and interface begin to erode.

The workshop starts from the premise that editable reality is not a speculative future scenario. It is already emerging through prototypes, pilot deployments, design choices, and regulatory blind spots. At the same time, the idea of “editing the world” is not entirely new. Humans have always curated their environments socially, culturally, and spatially, by forming communities, choosing neighborhoods, and shaping boundaries of belonging and exclusion. What distinguishes the editable world today is a new mode of curation: one that operates through real-time perceptual mediation, individualized algorithmic layers, and continuous computational rendering of physical reality. Editing shifts from visible, collective, and slow-moving social practices to individualized, adaptive, and often opaque interventions embedded directly into perception.

This transformation raises urgent questions for law, policy, and governance. Who governs phygital spaces when digital layers are controlled by private platforms while physical spaces remain subject to public law? How should legal systems conceptualize public space when it is no longer a singular, stable entity, or uniformly shared? What happens to legal notions of privacy, dignity, autonomy, and consent when perception itself becomes a site of data extraction, inference, nudging, and, in particular in the context of digital sexualized violence, abuse? And how can democratic accountability be preserved when citizens inhabit different versions of the same physical environment?
These dynamics expose a growing governance vacuum, in which public law regimes governing physical space coexist uneasily with privately governed digital layers that increasingly structure visibility, access, and behaviour.

The workshop also recognizes that the editable world is shaped by economic incentives and political economy. Much like the early Internet, phygital environments risk a trajectory from openness toward enclosure, as proprietary business models, monetization of perception, and platorm-based gatekeeping reshape access to and participation in physical public space. This raises familiar yet unresolved questions about power asymmetries, privatization of shared infrastructures, and the role of competition, data, and intellectual property law in governing perceptual environments.


About humanet3

humanet3 is an interdisciplinary research group which analyzes, deconstructs, and contributes to initiatives aiming at a human-centered digital transformation, as proposed by the European Union in its ‘European Declaration on Digital Rights and Principles for the Digital Decade’. humanet3 is a joint research group established by the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (Prof. Armin von Bogdandy), the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition (Prof. Josef Drexl), and the Center for Humans and Machines (CHM) at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development in Berlin (Prof. Iyad Rahwan). It is led by Erik Tuchtfeld, further group members are Anna Sophia Tiedeke, Arian Henning, Chaewon Yun, Germán Oscar Johannsen, and Natalie Abel.

Seminar  |  04.11.2026 | 15:00  –  16:15

Preview: Net Zero Lab x I&E Seminar mit Gunter Glenk

Gunter Glenk (Mannheim University)


hybrid (Raum 342/Zoom)

Titel und Abstract folgen.


Ansprechpartner: Isabel Haase


Eintragung in den Einladungsverteiler und mehr Informationen auf der Seminarseite.

Seminar  |  21.10.2026 | 15:00  –  16:15

Preview: Net Zero Lab x I&E Seminar mit Johanna Arlinghaus

Johanna Arlinghaus  (Hertie School)


hybrid (Raum 342/Zoom)

Titel und Abstract folgen.


Ansprechpartner: Malte Toetzke


Eintragung in den Einladungsverteiler und mehr Informationen auf der Seminarseite.

Tagung  |  15.10.2026, 09:00  –  16.10.2026, 17:00

Munich Conference on IP, Competition and Innovation

In Zusam­men­arbeit mit dem Centre for a Digital Society am European University Institute (EUI) 

The goal of the Conference on IP, Competition and Innovation is to stimulate an in-depth discussion of selected academic papers with particular emphasis on the policy impact of the research findings. 

Information on abstract submission 

Tagung  |  03.09.2026, 09:30  –  04.09.2026, 16:00

The Law of Digital Value Chains: 2nd Transnational Junior Faculty Forum

Eine Veranstaltung von Max Planck Law und dem German Law Journal


Registrierung erforderlich

Digitization is reshaping social, political, and economic relations and systems. Data-driven services and solutions have become essential to production, consumption and infrastructures. Central to these changes are digitized and digital value chains built around digital products and the extraction of data from multiple sources, including individuals. They operate in a field characterized by multiple actors (states, organizations, companies, individuals) embedded in multiple areas of law (including, but not only, contract, property, company, competition, IP, data, trade, environmental, human rights and international law) at different levels (regional, national, supranational, international). Law brings about and shapes these value chains.


For its 2nd Transnational Junior Faculty Forum, the German Law Journal and Max Planck Law invite extended abstracts (ca. 500 words) by early-career scholars investigating the law of digital value chains from across different fields of law. We especially invite contributions from the perspective of critical approaches, as well as research that works with methods from other disciplines. The extended abstracts should contain the research problem, theoretical or conceptual framework, description of perspective, outline of methods, and a prospective bibliography.


Please submit your abstract by 15 April 2026. Successful applicants will be notified by 16 May 2026. Articles are due by 23 August 2026.


There is no registration fee. Limited funding will be available for participants based outside Europe.


To register, please email Irina Domurath: irina.domurath(at)unipd.it
If you would like to attend without presenting a paper please e-mail petersson(at)law.mpg.de to register.

Seminar  |  15.07.2026 | 15:00  –  16:15

Preview: Innovation & Entrepreneurship Seminar mit Colleen Cunningham

Colleen Cunningham (University of Utah)


hybrid (Raum 342/Zoom)

Titel und Abstract folgen.


Ansprechpartner: Elisabeth Hofmeister


Eintragung in den Einladungsverteiler und mehr Informationen auf der Seminarseite.

Vortrag  |  02.07.2026, 17:30  –  16.03.2026, 19:00

Fehlentwicklungen im (EU-)Lauterkeitsrecht

Prof. Dr. Christian Alexander (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena)
Eine Veranstaltung der GRUR
Anmeldung erforderlich


Auditorium/hybrid

Seminar  |  01.07.2026 | 15:00  –  16:15

Preview: Innovation & Entrepreneurship Seminar mit Jermain Kaminski

Jermain Kaminski (Maastricht University)


hybrid (Raum 342/Zoom)

Titel und Abstract folgen.


Ansprechpartner: Jordan Bisset


Eintragung in den Einladungsverteiler und mehr Informationen auf der Seminarseite.

Seminar  |  30.06.2026 | 15:00  –  18:00

TIME Kolloquium

Sophia Wetzler (ISTO), Christian Untch (TUM), Michael E. Rose (Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb)

TUM Central Campus, gegenüber Luisenstr. 51, Gebäude 0505, Raum 0544

Just Taking a Break? “Hiatists” in Online Communities
Presenter: Sophia Wetzler (ISTO)
Discussant: Dominik Asam (Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb)


All online communities depend on active volunteer engagement to sustain themselves and flourish. Experienced community members are particularly valuable because they are familiar with the community’s standards and practices. However, prior research has primarily studied active community members while overlooking experienced community members in hiatus. We want to fill this gap. We conceptualize hiatus as a complete but temporary pause in regular engagement, distinct from engagement decreases or attrition. Based on an extensive dataset of inner-community competitions on the software crowdsourcing platform “Topcoder”, we study pre-, within-, and post-hiatus behavior. In our analysis, we identify hiatus-taking to be driven by a lack of success, a scarcity of communication options within the community, and peer evaluations, which motivate experienced members but deter beginners. We further provide explorative evidence regarding “hiatists’” within-hiatus activities and post-hiatus performance and find that hiatus-taking often reflects a shift towards related activities.


Standard Development Cost as an Economic Anchor for FRAND Determination
PresenterChristian Untch (TUM) 
Discussant: Frederike Eulitz (ISTO)


Owners of standard-essential patents (SEPs) on communication standards such as 5G and Wi-Fi are obliged to license their SEPs on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms. In court cases, FRAND terms are often defined based on comparable licenses or, in a top-down approach, on an assumed royalty for the standard’s entire SEP stack. We argue that both approaches lack an economic anchor, and hence neither of them can guarantee fair and reasonable outcomes. We argue that the cost of standard development constitutes the only anchor based on economic reasoning since it allows determining a return rate. Combining qualitative evidence from expert interviews with large-scale quantitative data on standard participation, patenting activity, and licensing revenues, we estimate for the period 2014 to 2020 the development and licensing costs of cellular and Wi-Fi standards and contrast them with realized SEP royalties. We find that, for the six major licensors, aggregate revenues from SEP licensing are nearly eleven times as large as estimated development costs, even under conservative assumptions. Considering the value of cross-licensing and own use of SEPs in the owner’s products, this estimation is almost fourteen times. Even allowing for a risk premium, this ratio seems far too large to be fair and reasonable. Our results have implications for ongoing policy debates on SEP regulation and for the economic assessment of licensing practices in standard-based industries. As a theoretical contribution, we show that standard development cost is the only economic anchor for determining FRAND royalties.


The Role of Knowledge Diversity in University Technology Transfer: Evidence from China
Presenter: Michael E. Rose (Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb) 
Discussant: Dekai Xiao (TUM)


Drawing on the knowledge-based view and innovation chain perspectives, this study addresses the underexplored stage-specific effects of knowledge diversity on university technology transfer performance. By linking principal investigators’ prior publications to their patents and matching university independent patents with university–industry patents, we measure two distinct forms of knowledge diversity and examine their effects across the innovation process. Results show that disciplinary knowledge diversity increases patent grant likelihood. In contrast, cross-sector knowledge diversity, captured through firm participation, has no significant effect on patent grant but significantly enhances both transfer probability and transfer depth. Further analyses reveal little evidence that these commercialization advantages are explained by changes in the knowledge content of inventions, as knowledge distance between PIs’ prior publications and patents does not mediate the relationship. This study contributes to the university technology transfer literature by demonstrating that different forms of knowledge diversity matter at different stages of the innovation process and by highlighting the importance of downstream complementary capabilities in university–industry collaboration.