Prof. Dr. Felix Pöge
Affiliated Research Fellow
Innovation and Entrepreneurship Research
Persönliche Webseite
Arbeitsbereiche:
Innovationsökonomik, Wissenschaftsökonomik, Industrieökonomik, Mikroökonometrie
Wissenschaftlicher Werdegang
Seit 10/2023
Affiliated Research Fellow
Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb
Seit 2023
Assistant Professor im Department of Management and Technology
Bocconi Universität Mailand, Italien
2021 – 2023
Postdoctoral Researcher at Technology & Policy Research Initiative
Boston University Boston, MA, USA
2016 – 2021
Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter und Doktorand am Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb (Innovation and Entrepreneurship Research)
Titel der Dissertation: “Corporate Innovation – The Role of Scientific Discoveries, Taxation and Antitrust”
2020
Virtueller Gaststudent, University of Maryland, Robert H. Smith School of Business, College Park, MD, USA, Gastgeber: Serguey Braguinsky
2019
Gastwissenschaftler, Boston University, Questrom School of Business, Boston, MA, USA, Gastgeber: Jeff Furman
Seit 2017
Research Affiliate, IZA Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn
2015
Praktikum bei der Organisation für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (OECD), Paris
2013 – 2016
Studium der Volkswirtschaftslehre (M.Sc.) an der Universität Bonn
2013 – 2016
Studentischer Mitarbeiter bei dem Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA), Bonn
2013 – 2014
Studentischer Mitarbeiter und Tutor an der Universität Bonn
2010 – 2013
Studium der Volkswirtschaftslehre (B.Sc.) an der Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg sowie der National University of Singapore
Ehrungen, Stipendien, wissenschaftliche Preise
2021
Otto-Hahn-Medaille der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft in Anerkennung herausragender wissenschaftlicher Leistungen für die Dissertation “Corporate Innovation – The Role of Scientific Discoveries, Taxation and Antitrust”
2020
Ausgewählt als CCC Visiting Student, University of Maryland, Smith School of Business, Gastgeber: Serguey Braguinski
2020
Best Paper Award Finalist of the TIM Division at AOM
2018
EPIP Best Paper Award for Young Researchers
2012 - 2015
Stipendium der Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes
2011 - 2012
Deutschlandstipendium
Publikationen
Artikel in referierten Fachzeitschriften
Like Stars: How Firms Learn at Scientific Conferences, Management Science 2024. DOI
(2024).- Scientific conferences are an underexplored channel by which firms can learn from science. We provide empirical evidence that firms learn from scientific conferences in which they participate but also that this is conditional on intense participation. Using data from conference papers in computer science since the 1990s, we show that corporate investments in participation are both frequent and highly skewed, with some firms contributing to a given conference scientifically, some as sponsors, and some doing both. We use direct flights as an instrumental variable for the probability that other scientists participate in the same conference as a firm, altering the knowledge set to which the firm is exposed. We find that a firm’s use of scientists’ knowledge increases when they participate in the same conferences. Greater participation efforts, where the firm seeks the spotlight by both sponsoring the conference and contributing to its scientific discourse, foretell research collaborations and a stronger learning effect. Such learning is disproportionately concentrated among the most prominent firms and scientists rather than benefitting those without alternative interaction channels. Therefore, on average, firms learn from scientists that they encounter at conferences, but the substantial heterogeneity of the effect reflects the influence of reputation mechanisms in social interactions.
- Also published as: Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 20-10
Filling the Gap - Firm Strategies for Human Capital Loss, Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2020 (1), 2020 (1)71. DOI
(2020).- This paper explores how the premature death of an inventor affects the productivity and career trajectories of co-inventors. To this end, we develop and analyze a dataset covering the careers of 152,350 German inventors. The data combine highly precise employer-employee data from official social security registers with patent office information covering the period from 1980-2014. Departing from 799 registered premature deaths of inventors and the same number of matched inventors, we study how co-inventors were affected by the death of their peers. Using a difference-in-differences and an event study design, we investigate the reaction of the co-inventors' patenting activities, career advancement and job mobility. Using a number of measures and robustness checks, our results show that the premature death of a co-inventor reduces the productivity of the surviving co-inventors. The effect sets in immediately and survivors do not seem to recover from the shock in the five years following. We argue that employers will seek to retain co-inventors under certain conditions in order to continue lines of research and invention. The empirical results confirm our expectations: surviving inventors are significantly less likely to move to a different employer and are more likely to be promoted compared to inventors in the control group. These effects seem to diminish after about two years."
Science Quality and the Value of Inventions, Science Advances, 5 (12), eaay7323. DOI
(2019).- Despite decades of research, the relationship between the quality of science and the value of inventions has remained unclear. We present the result of a large-scale matching exercise between 4.8 million patent families and 43 million publication records. We find a strong positive relationship between quality of scientific contributions referenced in patents and the value of the respective inventions. We rank patents by the quality of the science they are linked to. Strikingly, high-rank patents are twice as valuable as low-rank patents, which in turn are about as valuable as patents without direct science link. We show this core result for various science quality and patent
value measures. The effect of science quality on patent value remains relevant even when science is linked indirectly through other patents. Our findings imply that what is considered “excellent” within the science sector also leads to outstanding outcomes in the technological or commercial realm. - Also published as: arXiv preprint 1903.05020
- Article: Excellence Breeds Invention, Research Europe 510 (2020), 11
Estimating Measures of Multidimensional Poverty with Stata, Stata Journal, 17 (3), 687-703.
(2017).Andere Veröffentlichungen, Presseartikel, Interviews
Vox EU Column 2021 21.12.2021.
(2021). Higher Profit Taxes Reduce Firms' R&D Activities,- Studies have shown that targeted R&D tax incentives – such as tax credits for R&D spending – induce firms to conduct more R&D. However, little is known about the effects of general profit taxes on firm-level R&D spending and innovation output. This column presents evidence from Germany that points to sizeable negative effects of increasing profit taxes on firms’ R&D spending and patents. However, slashing business tax rates may not be the most efficient policy instrument to spur innovation altogether.
Research Europe, (510), 11.
(2020). Excellence Breeds Invention. The Most Highly Cited Papers Feature in the Most Valuable Patents,- Article "Science Quality and the Value of Inventions" in Science Advances, Vol. 5 (2019) No. 12, eaay7323
- More detailed online version of the article in Research Europe, which was the basis for the printed article.
Monographien
Corporate Innovation: The Role of Scientific Discoveries, Taxation and Antitrust. Doctoral Thesis. München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität.
(2021).Diskussionspapiere
Filling the Gap: The Consequences of Collaborator Loss in Corporate R&D, Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, No. 22-17.
(2022).- We examine how collaborator loss affects knowledge workers in corporate R&D. We argue that such a loss affects the remaining collaborators not only by reducing their team-specific capital (as argued in the prior literature) but also by increasing their bargaining power over the employer, who is in need of filling the gap left by the lost collaborator to ensure the continuation of R&D projects. This shift in bargaining power may, in turn, lead to benefits, such as additional resources or more attractive working conditions. These benefits can partially compensate for the negative effect of reduced team-specific capital on productivity and influence the career trajectories of the remaining collaborators. We empirically investigate the consequences of collaborator loss by exploiting 845 unexpected deaths of active inventors. We find that inventor death has a moderate negative effect on the productivity of the remaining collaborators. This negative effect disappears when we focus on the remaining collaborators who work for the same employer as the deceased inventor. Moreover, this group is more likely to be promoted and less likely to leave their current employer.
- Available at SSRN
Competition and Innovation: The Breakup of IG Farben, Boston Univ. School of Law Research Paper, No. #22-24. DOI
(2022).- The relationship between competition and innovation is difficult to disentangle, as exogenous variation in market structure is rare. The 1952 breakup of Germany’s leading chemical company, IG Farben, represents such a disruption. After the Second World War, the Allies occupying Germany imposed the breakup because of IG Farben’s importance for the German war economy instead of standard antitrust concerns. In technology areas where the breakup reduced concentration, patenting increased strongly, driven by domestic firms unrelated to IG Farben. An analysis of patent texts shows that an increased propensity to patent does not drive the effect. Descriptively, IG Farben’s successors increased their patenting activities as well, and their patenting specialized relative to the pre-breakup period. The results are consistent with a breakup-induced innovation increase by the IG Farben successors, which then spilled over to the wider chemical industry.
Like Stars: How Firms Learn at Scientific Conferences, Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, No. 20-10. DOI
(2022).- Scientific conferences are an underexplored channel by which firms learn from science. Although attendance per se may be sufficient to lower search costs in relation to scientific knowledge, we show that active participation and corporate investments in reputation are necessary to establish the personal connections that act as the key learning channel. Using data from conference papers in computer science since the 1990s, we show that corporate investments in participation are both frequent and highly skewed, some firms contributing to a given conference scientifically, some as sponsors, and some doing both. We use direct flights as an instrumental variable for the probability that other scientists participate in the same conference as a firm and find that this increases the firm’s use of the scientists’ knowledge. However, the most significant benefits accrue if the firm seeks the spotlight by both sponsoring the conference and taking part in its scientific discourse. Additional analyses show that these efforts foretell research collaborations and suggest that participation is more relevant in circumstances where the conference helps to trigger personal interactions, even when knowledge search costs are otherwise low.
- Forthcoming in: Management Science
Profit Taxation, R&D Spending, and Innovation, IZA Discussion Paper, 14830.
(2021).- We study how profit taxation affects plants' R&D spending and innovation activities. Relying on geocoded survey panel data which approximately covers the universe of R&D-active plants in Germany, we exploit around 7,300 changes in the municipal business tax rate over the period 1987–2013 for identification. Applying event study models, we find a negative and statistically significant effect of an increase in profit taxation on plants' R&D spending with an implied long-run elasticity of −1.25. Reductions in R&D are particularly strong among more credit-constrained plants. In contrast, homogeneity of effects across the plant size distribution questions policy makers common practice to link targeted R&D tax incentives to plant size. We further find lagged negative effects on the (citation-weighted) number of filed patents.
- https://www.iza.org/de/publications/dp/14830/imprint
- Also published as: CEPR Discussion Paper 16702
- Also published as:ZEW Discussion Paper Nr. 21-080
Profit Taxation, R&D Spending, and Innovation, ZEW - Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, No. 21-080.
(2021).- We study how profit taxation affects plants’ R&D spending and innovation activities. Relying on geocoded survey panel data which approximately covers the universe of R&D-active plants in Germany, we exploit around 7,300 changes in the municipal business tax rate over the period 1987–2013 for identification. Applying event study models, we find a negative and statistically significant effect of an increase in profit taxation on plants’ R&D spending with an implied long-run elasticity of −1.25. Reductions in R&D are particularly strong among more credit-constrained plants. In contrast, homogeneity of effects across the plant size distribution questions policy makers common practice to link targeted R&D tax incentives to plant size. We further find lagged negative effects on the (citation-weighted) number of filed patents.
- https://www.zew.de/publikationen/profit-taxation-rd-spending-and-innovation
- Also published as: CEPR Discussion Paper 16702
- Also published as: IZA Discussion Paper, 14830
Profit Taxation, R&D Spending, and Innovation, CEPR Discussion Paper, 16702.
(2021).- We study how profit taxation affects plants’ R&D spending and innovation activities. Relying on geocoded survey panel data which approximately covers the universe of R&D-active plants in Germany, we exploit around 7,300 changes in the municipal business tax rate over the period 1987–2013 for identification. Applying event study models, we find a negative and statistically significant effect of an increase in profit taxation on plants’ R&D spending with an implied long-run elasticity of -1.25. Reductions in R&D are particularly strong among more credit-constrained plants. In contrast, homogeneity of effects across the plant size distribution questions policy makers common practice to link targeted R&D tax incentives to plant size. We further find lagged negative effects on the (citation-weighted) number of filed patents.
- https://cepr.org/publications/dp16702
- Alsopublished as: ZEW Discussion Paper Nr. 21-080
- Also published as: IZA Discussion Paper, 14830
A Firm Scientific Community: Industry Participation and Knowledge Diffusion, IZA Discussion Paper, No. 13419.
(2020).- We study the diffusion of knowledge from scientists to firms within scientific communities. We build on a unique dataset on conference proceedings as "paper trail" of almost all relevant conference series in computer science since 1996. More than 5000 firms appear as conference sponsors or as affiliations in proceedings. Their participation is concentrated in the highly ranked conferences and their scientific contributions are on average highly cited. We exploit direct flights as an instrumental variable for the participation choice of scientists between a conference where a firm participates and other similar conferences. The participation in the same conference has a positive causal effect on knowledge diffusion to the firm's scientific and inventive activities. Additional analyses suggest that interactions and collaborations with scientists that remain external to the firm are likely a key mechanism of this diffusion. The effects are remarkably stronger the larger the firm's investments in participation.
- https://www.iza.org/de/publications/dp/13419/a-firm-scientific-community-industry-participation-and-knowledge-diffusion
A Firm Scientific Community: Industry Participation and Knowledge Diffusion, Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, No. 20-10.
(2020).- We study the diffusion of knowledge from scientists to firms within scientific communities. We build on a unique dataset on conference proceedings as “paper trail” of almost all relevant conference series in computer science since 1996. More than 5000 firms appear as conference sponsors or as affiliations in proceedings. Their participation is concentrated in the highly ranked conferences and their scientific contributions are on average highly cited. We exploit direct flights as an instrumental variable for the participation choice of scientists between a conference where a firm participates and other similar conferences. The participation in the same conference has a positive causal effect on knowledge diffusion to the firm’s scientific and inventive activities. Additional analyses suggest that interactions and collaborations with scientists that remain external to the firm are likely a key mechanism of this diffusion. The effects are remarkably stronger the larger the firm’s investments in participation.
- Available at SSRN
- Also published as: DRUID19; 4936
Science Quality and the Value of Inventions, arXiv preprint 1903.05020.
(2019).- Despite decades of research, the relationship between the quality of science and the value of inventions has remained unclear. We present the result of a large-scale matching exercise between 4.8 million patent families and 43 million publication records. We find a strong positive relationship between quality of scientific contributions referenced in patents and the value of the respective inventions. We rank patents by the quality of the science they are linked to. Strikingly, high-rank patents are twice as valuable as low-rank patents, which in turn are about as valuable as patents without direct science link. We show this core result for various science quality and patent
value measures. The effect of science quality on patent value remains relevant even when science is linked indirectly through other patents. Our findings imply that what is considered “excellent” within the science sector also leads to outstanding outcomes in the technological or commercial realm. - https://arxiv.org/pdf/1903.05020.pdf
- Also published in Science Advances 2019, Vol. 5, No. 12, eaay7323
A Firm Scientific Community, DRUID19, 4936. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
(2019).- The diffusion of scientific knowledge to industry is instrumental to technological change and productivity growth. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which firms participate in scientific communities' activities and whether this facilitates the exchange and transfer of scientific knowledge
to firms' technological activities. We focus on two modes of interactions of firms with scientific communities: the participation to and the sponsorship of international scientific conferences. We exploit a newly constructed database comprising the set of all conference proceedings in computer science from 1996 until 2015 from a specialized computer science database (DBLP) matched to Web of
Science and Scopus and conference ranking information. We track knowledge transfers by patent and science citations to these proceedings. First, we document that both conference participation and
sponsorship by firms is frequent and concentrated in the events of the highest quality. Contributions of firms at conferences are of higher average quality, even within individual conferences. Second, we go
on to find that firms are significantly more likely to cite in their patents and papers the scientific articles presented at a conference which they attended relative to comparable articles presented at other conferences. We use airline connectivity between researcher and conference locations in an instrumental variable strategy to establish causality.
Linked Inventor Biography Data 1980-2014, FDZ Data Report, No. 03/2018.
(2018).- This data report describes the Linked Inventor Biography Data 1980-2014 (INV-BIO ADIAB 8014), its generation using record linkage and machine learning methods as well as how to access the data via the FDZ.
- Dieser Datenreport beschreibt die verknüpften Erfinderbiografiedaten 1980-2014 (INV-BIO ADIAB 8014), deren Erstellung mittels Record Linkage und Machine Learning Methoden sowie den Datenzugang über das FDZ.
- http://doku.iab.de/fdz/reporte/2018/DR_03-18_EN.pdf
Vorträge
13.12.2021
Competition and Innovation: The Breakup of IG Farben
LMU Innovation Workshop
Ort: online
31.10.2021
Competition and Innovation: The Breakup of IG Farben
Jahrestagung, Economic History Association
Ort: Tucson, AZ, USA
13.10.2021
Competition and Innovation: The Breakup of IG Farben
TPRI Brown Bag Seminar, Boston University
Ort: Boston, USA
28.09.2021
Competition and Innovation: The Breakup of IG Farben
Jahrestagung, Verein für Socialpolitik, Universität Regensburg
Ort: online
28.09.2021
Competition and Innovation: The Breakup of IG Farben
EPFL Virtual Innovation Seminar, EPFL
Ort: online
28.08.2021
Competition and Innovation: The Breakup of IG Farben
EARIE, Bergen, Norwegen
Ort: online
29.06.2021
Competition and Innovation: The Breakup of IG Farben
BEWIP Seminar, TU München
Ort: online
16.06.2021
Competition and Innovation: The Breakup of IG Farben
DICE Brown Bag Seminar, Universität Düsseldorf
Ort: online
27.05.2021
Competition and Innovation: The Breakup of IG Farben
EBE/CRC Summer School 2021: Applied Microeconomics
Ort: online
10.05.2021
Competition and Innovation: The Breakup of IG Farben
8th CRC 190 Retreat, Schwanenwerder
Ort: online
23.11.2020
Competition and Innovation: Breaking IG Farben
Innovation Seminar, LMU
Ort: online/München
14.10.2020
Competition and Innovation: Dissolving IG Farben
Forschungsseminar in Economic History, Universität Mannheim
Ort: online/Mannheim
30.09.2020
A Firm Scientific Community
Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik
Ort: online
17.09.2020
Competition and Innovation: Dissolving IG Farben
CDSS Seminar, Universität Maryland
Ort: online/Maryland, USA
09.09.2020
Competition and Innovation: Dissolving IG Farben
Forschungsseminar
Ort: online/München
27.08.2020
A Firm Scientific Community
European Economic Association Meeting
Ort: online
09.08.2020
Filling the Gap-Firm Strategies for Human Capital Loss
Academy of Management Conference
Ort: online
27.08.2020
A Firm Scientific Community
KTO Seminar, Skema
Ort: online/SKEMA
03.03.2020
Competition and Innovation: Dissolving IG Farben
Forschungsseminar
Ort: Zugspitze
04.12.2019
Deconcentration and Innovation: Dissolving IG Farben
TPRI Brown Bag, Boston University Law
Ort: Boston, Massachusetts, USA
30.10.2019
A Firm Scientific Community: Participation of Industry to Academia and Knowledge Diffusion
PhD Seminar, University of Utah Eccles
Ort: Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
30.10.2019
A Firm Scientific Community: Participation of Industry to Academia and Knowledge Diffusion
S&I Brown Bag, Boston University Questrom
Ort: Boston, Massachusetts, USA
12.08.2019
A Firm Scientific Community
Academy of Management Conference
Ort: Boston, Massachusetts, USA
08.07.2019
Deconcentration and Innovation: Dissolving IG Farben
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Innovation Seminar
Ort: München
13.06.2019
A Firm Scientific Community - Do Scientific Conferences Facilitate Knowledge Transmission to Private Firms?
Munich Young Economist Meeting
Ort: Kochel am See
17.05.2019
A Firm Scientific Community
Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung Innopat
Ort: Mannheim
13.04.2019
A Firm Scientific Community - Do Scientific Conferences Facilitate Knowledge Transmission to Private Firms?
24th Spring Meeting of Young Economists
Ort: Brüssel, Belgien
23.03.2019
Do Scientific Conferences Facilitate Knowledge Transmission to Private Firms?
Innovation, Technological Change and International Trade Workshop
Ort: Heilbronn
10.12.2018
Do Scientific Conferences Facilitate Knowledge Transmission to Private Firms?
Junior Researcher Workshop 2018, Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb
Ort: München
30.10.2018
A Firm Scientific Community: Do Scientific Conferences Facilitate Knowledge Transmission to Private Firms?
IO and Trade Seminar, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
Ort: München
02.10.2018
A Firm Scientific Community: Do Scientific Conferences Facilitate Knowledge Transmission to Private Firms?
MGSE Colloquium, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
Ort: München
06.09.2018
A Firm Scientific Community: Do Scientific Conferences Facilitate Knowledge Transmission to Private Firms?
EPIP 2018, ESMT Berlin
Ort: Berlin
01.02.2018
R&D Investments, Innovation and Corporate Taxation: Evidence from German Municipalities
4th Geography of Innovation Conference
Ort: Barcelona, Spanien
05.10.2017
R&D Investments, Innovation and Corporate Taxation: Evidence from German Municipalities
MGSE Colloquium, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
Ort: München